Point Shear Wave Elastography by Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse Quantification in Comparison to Transient Elastography for the Noninvasive Assessment of Liver Fibrosis in Chronic Hepatitis C: A Prospective International Multicenter Study

M. Friedrich-Rust; M. Lupsor; R. de Knegt; V. Dries; P. Buggisch; M. Gebel; B. Maier; E. Herrmann; A. Sagir; R. Zachoval; Y. Shi; M. D. Schneider; R. Badea; K. Rifai; T. Poynard; S. Zeuzem; C. Sarrazin

doi:10.1055/s-0034-1398987

Ultraschall in der Medizin - European Journal of Ultrasound, Table of Contents

Ultraschall Med 2015; 36(03): 239-247
DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1398987

Original Article

Point Shear Wave Elastography by Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse Quantification in Comparison to Transient Elastography for the Noninvasive Assessment of Liver Fibrosis in Chronic Hepatitis C: A Prospective International Multicenter Study

Scherwellen-Elastografie mit Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse-Quantifizierung im Vergleich zu transienter Elastografie für die nicht-invasive Beurteilung des Leberfibrosestadiums bei chronischer Hepatitis C: eine prospektive internationale Multicenterstudie

M. Friedrich-Rust

¹Department of Internal Medicine 1, J. W. Goethe-University Hospital, Frankfurt, Germany

,

M. Lupsor

²Department of Ultrasound, University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania

,

R. de Knegt

³Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands

,

V. Dries

⁴Institute of Pathology, Institute of Pathology, Mannheim, Germany

,

P. Buggisch

⁵Hepatology, Institute for Interdisciplinary Medicine, Hamburg, Germany

,

M. Gebel

⁶Department of Internal Medicine, Medical School Hannover, Germany

,

B. Maier

¹Department of Internal Medicine 1, J. W. Goethe-University Hospital, Frankfurt, Germany

,

E. Herrmann

⁷Institute of Biostatistics and Mathematical Modelling, Faculty of Medicine, J. W. Goethe-University, Frankfurt, Germany

,

A. Sagir

⁸Department of Gastroenterology and Infectious Disease, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Germany

,

R. Zachoval

⁹Department of Medicine II, Campus Grosshadern, University Hospital Munich, Germany

,

Y. Shi

⁷Institute of Biostatistics and Mathematical Modelling, Faculty of Medicine, J. W. Goethe-University, Frankfurt, Germany

,

M. D. Schneider

¹Department of Internal Medicine 1, J. W. Goethe-University Hospital, Frankfurt, Germany

,

R. Badea

¹⁰Imaging, University Iuliu Hatieganu, Cluj, Romania

,

K. Rifai

¹¹Gastroenterology and Hepatology and Endocrinology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany

,

T. Poynard

¹²Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris, France

,

S. Zeuzem

¹Department of Internal Medicine 1, J. W. Goethe-University Hospital, Frankfurt, Germany

,

C. Sarrazin

¹Department of Internal Medicine 1, J. W. Goethe-University Hospital, Frankfurt, Germany

› Author Affiliations

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of the present prospective European multicenter study was to demonstrate the non-inferiority of point shear wave elastography (pSWE) compared to transient elastography (TE) for the assessment of liver fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis C.

Materials and Methods: 241 patients with chronic hepatitis C were prospectively enrolled at 7 European study sites and received pSWE, TE and blood tests. Liver biopsy was performed with histological staging by a central pathologist. In addition, for inclusion of cirrhotic patients, a maximum of 10 % of patients with overt liver cirrhosis confirmed by imaging methods were allowed by protocol (n = 24).

Results: Owing to slower than expected recruitment due to a reduction of liver biopsies, the study was closed after 4 years before the target enrollment of 433 patients with 235 patients in the ‘intention to diagnose’ analysis and 182 patients in the ‘per protocol’ analysis. Therefore, the non-inferiority margin was enhanced to 0.075 but non-inferiority of pSWE could not be proven. However, Paired comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of pSWE and TE revealed no significant difference between the two methods in the ‘intention to diagnose’ and ‘per protocol’ analysis (0.81 vs. 0.85 for F ≥ 2, p = 0.15; 0.88 vs. 0.92 for F ≥ 3, p = 0.11; 0.89 vs. 0.94 for F = 4, p = 0.19). Measurement failure was significantly higher for TE than for pSWE (p = 0.030).

Conclusion: Non-inferiority of pSWE compared to TE could not be shown. However, the diagnostic accuracy of pSWE and TE was comparable for the noninvasive staging of liver fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis C.

Zusammenfassung

Ziel: Ziel der vorliegenden prospektiven europäischen Multicenterstudie war es die Nicht-Unterlegenheit der Punkt-Scherwellenelastographie(pSWE) im Vergleich zur transienten Elastographie(TE) für die Beurteilung des Leberfibrosestadiums bei Patienten mit chronischer Hepatitis C nachzuweisen.

Material und Methoden: 241 Patienten mit chronischer Hepatitis C wurden prospektiv an 7 europäischen Zentren eingeschlossen und erhielten eine pSWE, TE und laborchemische Diagnostik. Die Leberhistologie wurde durch einen zentralen Pathologen beurteilt. Zusätzlich wurden maximal 10 % der Patienten ohne Leberhistologie mit gesicherter Leberzirrhose eingeschlossen (n = 24).

Ergebnisse: Bedingt durch einen europaweiten Rückgang der Zahl der Leberbiopsien wurde die Studie nach 4 Jahren Rekrutierung beendet bevor die Ziel-Patientenzahl von 433 erzielt werden konnte. Es konnten 235 Patienten in die ‘intention to diagnose’-Analyse und 182 Patienten in die ‘per protocol’-Analyse eingeschlossen werden. Die statistische Nicht-Unterlegenheitsgrenze wurde angepasst an die geringere Patientienzahl (0,075), die Nicht-Unterlegenheit von pSWE konnte nicht belegt werden. Jedoch ergab der gepaarte Vergleich der diagnostischen Genauigkeit von pSWE und TE keinen signifikanten Unterschied zwischen beiden Methoden sowohl in der ‘intention to diagnose’, als auch in der ‘per protocol’-Analyse (0,81 vs. 0,85 für F ≥ 2, p = 0,15; 0,88 vs. 0,92 für F ≥ 3, p = 0,11; 0,89 vs. 0,94 für F = 4, p = 0,19). Die Rate an Fehlmessungen war mit TE signifikant höher als mit pSWE (p = 0,030).

Schlussfolgerung: Die Nicht-Unterlegenheit von pSWE im Vergleich zu TE konnte nicht nachgewiesen werden. Jedoch war die diagnostische Genauigkeit von pSWE und TE vergleichbar gut für die nicht-invasive Beurteilung des Leberfibrosestadiums.

Clinical Trials Registration: NCT 01113814

Key words

ultrasound - staging - abdomen - hepatic veins

Full Text

References

Reference
1 El Serag HB. Hepatocellular carcinoma and hepatitis C in the United States. Hepatology 2002 36: S74-S83
2 National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference Statement. Management of hepatitis C 2002 (June 10–12, 2002). Hepatology 2002; 36: S3-S20
3 Castera L, Negre I, Samii K et al. Pain experienced during percutaneous liver biopsy. Hepatology 1999; 30: 1529-1530
4 Bedossa P, Dargere D, Paradise V. Sampling variability of liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C. Hepatology 2003; 38: 1449-1457
5 Maharaj B, Maharaj RJ, Leary WP et al. Sampling variability and its influence on the diagnostic yield of percutaneous needle biopsy of the liver. Lancet 1986; 1: 523-525
6 EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines: management of hepatitis C virus infection. J Hepatol 2011; 55: 245-264
7 EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines: Management of hepatitis C virus infection. J Hepatol 2014; 60: 392-420
8 Tsochatzis EA, Gurusamy KS, Ntaoula S et al. Elastography for the diagnosis of severity of fibrosis in chronic liver disease: a meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy. J Hepatol 2011; 54: 650-659
9 Friedrich-Rust M, Ong MF, Martens S et al. Performance of transient elastography for the staging of liver fibrosis: a meta-analysis. Gastroenterology 2008; 134: 960-974
10 Talwalkar JA, Kurtz DM, Schoenleber SJ et al. Ultrasound-based transient elastography for the detection of hepatic fibrosis: systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2007; 5 (10) 1214-1220
11 Stebbing J, Farouk L, Panos G et al. A meta-analysis of transient elastography for the detection of hepatic fibrosis. J Clin Gastroenterol 2010; 44: 214-219
12 Chon YE, Choi EH, Song KJ et al. Performance of transient elastography for the staging of liver fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis B: a meta-analysis. PLoS One 2012; 7: e44930
13 Friedrich-Rust M, Nierhoff J, Lupsor M et al. Performance of Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse imaging for the staging of liver fibrosis: a pooled meta-analysis. J Viral Hepat 2012; 19: e212-e219
14 Nierhoff J, Chavez Ortiz AA, Herrmann E et al. The efficiency of acoustic radiation force impulse imaging for the staging of liver fibrosis: a meta-analysis. Eur Radiol 2013; 23: 3040-3053
15 Palmeri ML, Wang MH, Dahl JJ et al. Quantifying hepatic shear modulus in vivo using acoustic radiation force. Ultrasound Med Biol 2008; 34: 546-558
16 Nightingale K, McAleavey S, Trahey G. Shear-wave generation using acoustic radiation force: in vivo and ex vivo results. Ultrasound Med Biol 2003; 29: 1715-1723
17 Sarvazyan AP, Rudenko OV, Swanson SD et al. Shear wave elasticity imaging: a new ultrasonic technology of medical diagnostics. Ultrasound Med Biol 1998; 24: 1419-1435
18 Sandrin L, Fourquet B, Hasquenoph JM et al. Transient elastography: a new non-invasive method for assessment of hepatic fibrosis. Ultrasound Med Biol 2003; 29: 1705-1713
19 Shaheen AA, Wan AF, Myers RP. FibroTest and FibroScan for the Prediction of Hepatitis C-Related Fibrosis: A Systematic Review of Diagnostic Test Accuracy. Am J Gastroenterol 2007; 102: 2589-2600
20 Bedossa P, Poynard T. An algorithm for the grading of activity in chronic hepatitis C. The METAVIR Cooperative Study Group. Hepatology 1996; 24: 289-293
21 Chevallier M, Guerret S, Chossegros P et al. A histological semiquantitative scoring system for evaluation of hepatic fibrosis in needle liver biopsy specimens: comparisaon with morphometric studies. Hepatology 1994; 20: 349-355
22 Ishak K, Baptista A, Bianchi L et al. Histological grading and staging of chronic hepatitis. J Hepatol 1995; 22: 696-699
23 Imbert-Bismut F, Messous D, Thibault V et al. Intra-laboratory analytical variability of biochemical markers of fibrosis (Fibrotest) and activity (Actitest) and reference ranges in healthy blood donors. Clin Chem Lab Med 2004; 42: 323-333
24 Poynard T, Ratziu V, Naveau S et al. The diagnostic value of biomarkers (SteatoTest) for the prediction of liver steatosis. Comp Hepatol 2005; 23: 4-10
25 Friedrich-Rust M, Wunder K, Kriener S et al. Liver fibrosis in viral hepatitis: noninvasive assessment with acoustic radiation force impulse imaging versus transient elastography. Radiology 2009; 252: 595-604
26 Youden WJ. Index for rating diagnostic tests. Cancer 1950; 3: 32-35
27 Bota S, Herkner H, Sporea I et al. Meta-analysis: ARFI elastography versus transient elastography for the evaluation of liver fibrosis. Liver Int 2013; 33: 1138-1147
28 Castera L, Foucher J, Bernard PH et al. Pitfalls of liver stiffness measurement: a 5-year prospective study of 13,369 examinations. Hepatology 2010; 51: 828-835
29 Bota S, Sporea I, Sirli R et al. Factors that influence the correlation of acoustic radiation force impulse (ARFI), elastography with liver fibrosis. Med Ultrason 2011; 13: 135-140
30 Chen YP, Liang XE, Dai L et al. Improving transient elastography performance for detecting hepatitis B cirrhosis. Dig Liver Dis 2012; 44: 61-66
31 Yoon KT, Lim SM, Park JY et al. Liver stiffness measurement using acoustic radiation force impulse (ARFI) elastography and effect of necroinflammation. Dig Dis Sci 2012; 57: 1682-1691
32 Bota S, Sporea I, Peck-Radosavljevic M et al. The influence of aminotransferase levels on liver stiffness assessed by Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse Elastography: a retrospective multicentre study. Dig Liver Dis 2013; 45: 762-768
33 Poynard T, de L V et al. FibroTest and Fibroscan performances revisited in patients with chronic hepatitis C. Impact of the spectrum effect and the applicability rate. Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol 2011; 35 (11) 720-730
34 Degos F, Perez P, Roche B et al. Diagnostic accuracy of FibroScan and comparison to liver fibrosis biomarkers in chronic viral hepatitis: a multicenter prospective study (the FIBROSTIC study). J Hepatol 2010; 53: 1013-1021
35 Zarski JP, Sturm N, Guechot J et al. Comparison of nine blood tests and transient elastography for liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C: the ANRS HCEP-23 study. J Hepatol 2012; 56: 55-62
36 Castera L, Sebastiani G, Le BB et al. Prospective comparison of two algorithms combining non-invasive methods for staging liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C. J Hepatol 2010; 52: 191-198
37 Sebastiani G, Halfon P, Castera L et al. SAFE biopsy: a validated method for large-scale staging of liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C. Hepatology 2009; 49: 1821-1827
38 Mehta SH, Lau B, Afdhal NH et al. Exceeding the limits of liver histology markers. J Hepatol 2009; 50: 36-41
39 Ngo Y, Munteanu M, Messous D et al. A prospective analysis of the prognostic value of biomarkers (FibroTest) in patients with chronic hepatitis C. Clin Chem 2006; 52 (10) 1887-1896
40 Parkes J, Roderick P, Harris S et al. European Liver Fibrosis (ELF) panel of serum markers can predict clinical outcome in a cohort of patients from England with mixed aetiology chronic liver disease. Hepatology 2007; 46: S1
41 Vergniol J, Foucher J, Terrebonne E et al. Noninvasive tests for fibrosis and liver stiffness predict 5-year outcomes of patients with chronic hepatitis C. Gastroenterology 2011; 140: 1970-1979
42 de Ledinghen V, Vergniol J, Barthe C et al. Non-invasive tests for fibrosis and liver stiffness predict 5-year survival of patients chronically infected with hepatitis B virus. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2013; 37 (10) 979-988